Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
INTERPLEADER SUIT
₹700 (30% OFF)
When two or more persons claim adversely to one another the same amount or property from another person who claims no in interest in the same save and except for his cost/charges. For the purpose of obtaining a decision as to whom the payment should be made or property should be delivered, he needs to file an Interpleader Suit before the appropriate court. This is the precedent of an interpleader suit.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of money lent and advanced.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 for recovery of the amount based on the dishonoured cheques.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION U/S 6 OF SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963
A person is forcibly dispossessed from the property without process of law. This is a precedent of suit for Recovery of Possession under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE AGREEMENT STANDS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties had entered into an agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit for a declaration that Agreement is validly terminated and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE
The Defendants have availed financial facility from the Plaintiff against the Mortgage of their property. The Defendants have failed to pay the mortgage debt to the Plaintiff. The Defendants have failed to redeem the Mortgage. The Plaintiff claims to be entitled to foreclosure the mortgage and become the Owner of the mortgaged property. This is the precedent of a suit for foreclosure of mortgage.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR EXECUTION OF A FOREIGN JUDGMENT/DECREE PASSED BY A NON-RECIPROCATING COUNTRY
A foreign Judgment/Decree is passed by a Non-Reciprocating Country against Indian Party who desires to execute the foreign Judgment in India. This is a precedent of suit for execution of a foreign Judgment/Decree passed by Non Reciprocating Country.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF THE REMAINING PRICE OF GOODS ORDERED WHEN DELIVERY NOT ACCEPTED
The Purchaser of the goods, though made part advance payment, has refused to accept the delivery of goods. This is a precedent of a Suit for recovery of the remaining price of goods ordered but delivery not accepted and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED
The disputes and differences have arisen amongst the legal heirs of the deceased in respect of the estate of the deceased. This is a precedent of Suit for Administration of the Estate of the Deceased.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
A person was maliciously prosecuted and prosecution against him/her failed. This is a precedent of Suit for damages for Malicious Prosecution.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT IN LIEU OF EXAMINATION IN CHIEF TO BE FILED UNDER ORDER XIX READ WITH ORDER XVIII RULE 4 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.
The Examination of a witness by a party who calls him shall be called his examination in Chief. It is a province of a party by whom the witness is called to examine him in chief for the purpose of eliciting from the witness all the material facts within his knowledge which tend to prove the party's case. This is a precedent of an affidavit in lieu of examination in chief to be filed under Order XIX read with Order XVIII (4) of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with averments to prove document u/s. 65 (B) of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 along with requisite Certificate also with averment to prove documents by Secondary evidence.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA FOR LISTING REVIEW PETITION IN OPEN COURT
Normally Review Petition before the Supreme Court is heard in chamber or decided by circulation. This is the precedent of an application to the Supreme Court of India to list the review Petition in open court for hearing.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.