Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
SUIT FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE AGREEMENT STANDS VALIDLY TERMINATED
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Parties had entered into an agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit for a declaration that Agreement is validly terminated and for
consequential reliefs.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND FOR IT’S ACCOUNTS
A Partnership Firm is dissolved by notice or otherwise. This is a precedent of Suit for Dissolution of a Partnership Firm, for accounts and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT ON TITLE FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY AND FOR POSSESSION
Your Ownership right to the property are disputed. This is a precedent of Suit on Title for a declaration that the Plaintiffs are the owners of property and for possession and also for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR SALE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY (SIMPLE MORTGAGE)
The property is mortgaged. Mortgaged debt is not paid. Mortgaged Property is required to be sold through Court. This is a precedent of suit for Sale of Mortgaged Property and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION U/S 6 OF SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963
A person is forcibly dispossessed from the property without process of law. This is a precedent of suit for Recovery of Possession under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
STANDARD DEFENCES TO BE RAISED IN THE WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE PLAINT (CIVIL SUIT)
Download Civil Suit Formats Online. The Plaintiff/s has/have filed the Civil Suit against the Defendant/s. These are the standard defenses normally adopted by the Defendant/s in the Written Statement/Reply.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BY DAUGHTER CLAIMING SHARE IN FATHER’S HUF AND PARTITION OF HUF PROPERTIES
The Daughter is claiming share in properties of father’s Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Daughter claiming share in Father’s HUF and portion of HUF properties.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFF FROM THE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
A person apprehends he will be dispossessed from the property without following the due process of law. This is a precedent of Suit for an Injunction from Dispossessing the Plaintiff from the property without due process of law.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED
This is the precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of amount for goods sold and delivered.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BASED ON PERSONALITY RIGHTS
The Plaintiff is a Celebrity having personality rights. The Defendant is wrongfully attempting to use Plaintiff’s name and other personality rights without the consent of the Plaintiff for commercial gain. This is a precedent of suit based on personality rights for an injunction and consequential reliefs.
₹875 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR MONEY LENT AND ADVANCED
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of money lent and advanced.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.