Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
A person was maliciously prosecuted and prosecution against him/her failed. This is a precedent of Suit for damages for Malicious Prosecution.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT BASED ON DISHONOURED CHEQUES
This is a precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 for recovery of the amount based on the dishonoured cheques.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED
This is the precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of amount for goods sold and delivered.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND FOR IT’S ACCOUNTS
A Partnership Firm is dissolved by notice or otherwise. This is a precedent of Suit for Dissolution of a Partnership Firm, for accounts and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFF FROM THE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
A person apprehends he will be dispossessed from the property without following the due process of law. This is a precedent of Suit for an Injunction from Dispossessing the Plaintiff from the property without due process of law.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INTERPLEADER SUIT
When two or more persons claim adversely to one another the same amount or property from another person who claims no in interest in the same save and except for his cost/charges. For the purpose of obtaining a decision as to whom the payment should be made or property should be delivered, he needs to file an Interpleader Suit before the appropriate court. This is the precedent of an interpleader suit.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF THE REMAINING PRICE OF GOODS ORDERED WHEN DELIVERY NOT ACCEPTED
The Purchaser of the goods, though made part advance payment, has refused to accept the delivery of goods. This is a precedent of a Suit for recovery of the remaining price of goods ordered but delivery not accepted and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT
This is the precedent of the suit/plaint for restraining the Defendant from infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark and for consequential reliefs. The Plaintiff is the owner and proprietor of the registered trademark. The Defendant is intentionally infringing the Plaintiff’s trademark.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL SUIT TO RECOVER MONEY (NOT A SUMMARY SUIT)
This is a precedent of Regular Civil Suit to recover money from the Defendant (Not a Summary Suit).
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DECLARING A PERSON WHO IS NOT TRACEABLE AS DEAD AND FOR SEEKING DIRECTION AGAINST THE CONCERNED AUTHORITY TO ISSUE HIS/HER DEATH CERTIFICATE
A person is missing for over a period of seven years and his whereabouts are not known in spite of efforts by the family and the Police Authorities. This is the precedent of a suit for declaration that missing person is presumed to have died and asking the authorities to issue Death Certificate of such a missing person.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE AGREEMENT STANDS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties had entered into an agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit for a declaration that Agreement is validly terminated and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.