Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
WRIT OF CERTIORARI FOR QUASHING IMPUGNED NOTICES/ANALYSIS REPORTS UNDER FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of the Writ of Certiorari for Quashing Impugned Notices/Analysis Reports Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Food, safety and standard authority of India has issued recall notices to the Petitioner for recall of the petitioner’s products from the market.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION FOR REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARK
The Trade Mark is advertised in Trade Journal, Notice of Opposition and Counter Statement to Notice of Opposition are filed. This is the precedent of Affidavit of Evidence in support of opposition to be filed by the party who is opposing the registration of the Trade Mark.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO RETIRE FROM A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
These are the precedents of notice of intention to retire from a partnership firm in terms of the Partnership Deed and subsequent public notice to be published upon retirement.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS AGAINST THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS FOR TREATING THE PETITIONER’S APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF PATENT AS ABANDONED
This is the precedent of the Writ Of Certiorari and Mandamus against The Controller Of Patents And Designs for Treating the Petitioner’s Application for Grant of Patent as Abandoned. The Controller of Patents and Designs is treating the Petitioner’s Application for grant of Patent as abandoned.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INVOCATION NOTICE UNDER ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR
Disputes have arose between the Parties and the Agreement between them provides for referring the same to Arbitration. This is the precedent of Invocation Notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator/s to arbitrate dispute between the Parties as per the written contract.
₹245 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
The Magistrate's court and also Session's court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session's court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
A SECURITISATION APPEAL TO DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002.
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. A Securitisation Application u/s. 17 of the said Act was filed by the Borrower before Debt Recovery Tribunal which is rejected. This is a precedent of an appeal u/s 18 of the said Act to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal challenging the said Order of Debt Recovery Tribunal.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of an Affidavit of Evidence in support of the Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
REPLY UNDER SECTION 13 (3A) OF SARFAESI, 2002 OF THE BORROWER/GUARANTORS TO STATUTORY NOTICE OF BANK/FINANCIAL INSTITUTION UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002
This is a precedent of reply under Section 13 (3A) of Sarfaesi, 2002 of the Borrower/Guarantors to statutory notice of Bank/Financial Institution under Section 13 (2) of Sarfaesi, 2002
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT IN THE RELEASED FILM
The precedent of a Notice for infringing copyright in the Film. The Producers are the Owners of copyright in the already released Cinematographic Film. Someone is by making a new film infringing the copyright of the said released film.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE TO BORROWERS AND THE GUARANTORS UNDER SECTION 13 (2) OF SARFAESIA, 2002 BY BANKS/FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
This is a precedent of notice by the Banks/Financial Institutions to the Borrower and the guarantors under Section 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.