Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
SUIT FOR DAMAGES FOR MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
₹700 (30% OFF)
A person was maliciously prosecuted and prosecution against him/her failed. This is a precedent of Suit for damages for Malicious Prosecution.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
APPLICATION FOR RAISING THE WARRANT OF ATTACHMENT OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 54 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908
The immovable property of a third party is attached in execution of a decree of the Court. This is a precedent of an application for raising Warrant of Attachment of immovable property under Order 21 Rule 54 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUMMARY SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF AMOUNT FOR GOODS SOLD AND DELIVERED
This is the precedent of Summary Suit to be filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 before appropriate court for recovery of amount for goods sold and delivered.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT CHALLENGING THE TERMINATION AND SEEKING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The Parties had entered into an Agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit by aggrieved party challenging the termination and seeking specific performance of the Agreement and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
STANDARD DEFENCES TO BE RAISED IN THE WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE PLAINT (CIVIL SUIT)
Download Civil Suit Formats Online. The Plaintiff/s has/have filed the Civil Suit against the Defendant/s. These are the standard defenses normally adopted by the Defendant/s in the Written Statement/Reply.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The parties have entered into an Agreement. The disputes have arisen. This is a precedent of Suit for Specific Performance.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BY DAUGHTER CLAIMING SHARE IN FATHER’S HUF AND PARTITION OF HUF PROPERTIES
The Daughter is claiming share in properties of father’s Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Daughter claiming share in Father’s HUF and portion of HUF properties.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR AN INJUNCTION FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PLAINTIFF FROM THE PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW
A person apprehends he will be dispossessed from the property without following the due process of law. This is a precedent of Suit for an Injunction from Dispossessing the Plaintiff from the property without due process of law.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT ON TITLE FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY AND FOR POSSESSION
Your Ownership right to the property are disputed. This is a precedent of Suit on Title for a declaration that the Plaintiffs are the owners of property and for possession and also for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION U/S 6 OF SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963
A person is forcibly dispossessed from the property without process of law. This is a precedent of suit for Recovery of Possession under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF THE REMAINING PRICE OF GOODS ORDERED WHEN DELIVERY NOT ACCEPTED
The Purchaser of the goods, though made part advance payment, has refused to accept the delivery of goods. This is a precedent of a Suit for recovery of the remaining price of goods ordered but delivery not accepted and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND FOR IT’S ACCOUNTS
A Partnership Firm is dissolved by notice or otherwise. This is a precedent of Suit for Dissolution of a Partnership Firm, for accounts and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.