Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
₹525 (30% OFF)
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
DEED OF EXCHANGE IN RESPECT OF RESIDENTIAL FLATS
The Parties are the Owners of their respective residential flats. Both the parties desires to exchange their respective flats with each other. This is the precedent of Deed of Exchange in respect of Residential Flats. This precedent can be also used for properties other than residential flats with appropriate changes.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT (OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE) FOR SEEKING EVICTION OF THE TENANT ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT AND PERMITTED INCREASES UNDER SECTION 15(2) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil Judge for seeking eviction of the tenant on the ground of non-payment of rent and permitted increases under Section 15(2) of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ONLY)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
DEED OF EXCHANGE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY
This is a precedent of Deed of Exchange of immovable properties. The parties are owners of their respective immovable properties and wish to exchange the same.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CERTIFICATE OF SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY BY BANKS UNDER SARFAESI ACT, 2002
This is a precedent of Sale of immovable property by Banks under SARFAESI Act 2002
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS COMMITTED ACTS CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 108 (o) OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 AS ALSO OF 16(1) (a) AND 16(1) (b) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court for recovery of possession on the ground that the Tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in violation of 16(1) (a), 16(1) (b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 by damaging the suit premises and carrying out structural changes of a permanent nature.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.