Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale! 
WRIT OF CERTIORARI FOR QUASHING IMPUGNED NOTICES/ANALYSIS REPORTS UNDER FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006
₹700 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of the Writ of Certiorari for Quashing Impugned Notices/Analysis Reports Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Food, safety and standard authority of India has issued recall notices to the Petitioner for recall of the petitioner’s products from the market.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
WRIT PETITION SEEKING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COLLEGE FOR GRANT OF RECOGNITION OF THE COURSE
This is a precedent of Writ of Mandamus filed before the Hon'ble High Court where a college is seeking grant of recognition of their course.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INVOCATION NOTICE UNDER ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR
Disputes have arose between the Parties and the Agreement between them provides for referring the same to Arbitration. This is the precedent of Invocation Notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator/s to arbitrate dispute between the Parties as per the written contract.
₹245 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
AFFIDAVIT OF EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of an Affidavit of Evidence in support of the Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARK, BEING THE TITLE OF THE CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM
This is the precedent of a Cease and desist Notice for infringement of the trademark being the title of the feature film. The producers are the registered proprietor of the trade mark being the title of the film. Someone is in infringement of the Producers’ proprietary right in the said title making a film with the same title.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) BEFORE HIGH COURT AGAINST SESSION’S COURT ORDER REFUSING TO DE-FREEZE/UNFREEZE BANK ACCOUNT
The Magistrate's court and also Session's court has refused to de-freeze the Bank Account of the Accused. The remedy is to approach the Hon'ble High Court. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) before the High Court against Session's court order refusing to de-freeze/unfreeze bank account.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT COMPELLING THE GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY TO TAKE MEASURES UNDER THE PRESCRIBED ACT AND RULES FRAMED THEREIN
This is the precedent of Public Interest Litigation/Writ Petition for compelling the Government Authority to take measures under the prescribed Act (i.e. The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986) and rules famed thereunder.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ALLOTMENT OF THE TENDER
This is the precedent of Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Certiorari is often issued by a superior court to the inferior court, public official, public body corporation tribunal and also government. This is the precedent where the allotment of public tender to lowest one is challenged.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) FOR CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND TRANSFER OF INVESTIGATION FROM ONE POLICE STATION TO ANY OTHER POLICE STATION AND/OR AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Criminal) for Certiorari and Mandamus for further Investigation and Transfer of Investigation From One Police Station To any Other Police Station and/or Authority.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.