Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale! 
ADMIRALTY SUIT FOR MARITIME CLAIM
₹700 (30% OFF)
The Plaintiff has maritime claim against the Owner of the Vessel who has failed to pay Plaintiff’s claim. The Vessel is within Indian territorial waters. For security and recovery of the Plaintiff’s claim, the Plaintiff is desirous to arrest and detain the Vessel under The Admiralty Act, 2017. This is a precedent of Admiralty suit in respect of maritime claim to be filed before the concerned High Court for arrest and detention of ship and monetary claim.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
SUIT FOR DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM AND FOR IT’S ACCOUNTS
A Partnership Firm is dissolved by notice or otherwise. This is a precedent of Suit for Dissolution of a Partnership Firm, for accounts and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR ADMINISTRATION OF THE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED
The disputes and differences have arisen amongst the legal heirs of the deceased in respect of the estate of the deceased. This is a precedent of Suit for Administration of the Estate of the Deceased.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR SALE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY (SIMPLE MORTGAGE)
The property is mortgaged. Mortgaged debt is not paid. Mortgaged Property is required to be sold through Court. This is a precedent of suit for Sale of Mortgaged Property and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BY DAUGHTER CLAIMING SHARE IN FATHER’S HUF AND PARTITION OF HUF PROPERTIES
The Daughter is claiming share in properties of father’s Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Daughter claiming share in Father’s HUF and portion of HUF properties.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DECLARATION THAT PURPORTED AGREEMENT IS VOID AND, IN ANY EVENT, THE SAME IS VALIDLY TERMINATED
The Parties have entered into an Agreement. One of the parties is contending that the Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is terminated. This is a precedent of suit for declaration that purported Agreement is void and, in any event, the same is validly terminated.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR DISPARAGEMENT IN RELATION TO COMPARATIVE ADVERTISING
The Plaintiff and the Defendant both are manufacturers and marketing of similar Products. The Defendant has released an advertisement comparing its product with Plaintiff’s product misleading the consumer as a result of comparison amounting to disparaging to Plaintiff’s products. This is a precedent of Suit for disparagement in relation to Comparative Advertising.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT FOR PREVENTION OF MISUSE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION/DATA/TRADE SECRETS
This is the suit for Prevention of misuse of Confidential Information/Data/Trade Secrets. The Defendant being an ex-employee of the Plaintiff is attempting or misusing confidential information, data and trade secrets of the Plaintiff.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT CHALLENGING THE TERMINATION AND SEEKING SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
The Parties had entered into an Agreement. One party has terminated the Agreement. This is a precedent of a suit by aggrieved party challenging the termination and seeking specific performance of the Agreement and for consequential reliefs.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN EVICTION SUIT AGAINST THE OCCUPANT WHO IS NOT ENTITLED TO PROTECTION OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999 UNDER SECTION 3(1)(B) OF THE SAID ACT SUCH AS COMPANIES HAVING A PAID UP CAPITAL OF MORE THAN RUPEE ONE CRORE, BANKS, PUBLIC SECTOR UNDERTAKINGS ETC.
This is a precedent of the eviction suit against the Occupant who is not entitled to protection of The Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 under Section 3(1)(b) of the said Act such as Companies having a paid up capital of more than rupee one crore, Banks, Public Sector Undertakings etc.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR BEFORE THE COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS COMMITTED ACTS CONTRARY TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 108 (o) OF THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY ACT, 1882 AS ALSO OF 16(1) (a) AND 16(1) (b) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of a suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court for recovery of possession on the ground that the Tenant has committed any act contrary to the provisions of clause (o) of section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 in violation of 16(1) (a), 16(1) (b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 by damaging the suit premises and carrying out structural changes of a permanent nature.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
SUIT BY A CO-PARCENER FOR PARTITION OF HUF AND ACCOUNTS
The disputes have arisen amongst the Co-parceners/ Members of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). This is a precedent of Suit by Co-parcener for Partition of HUF and accounts.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.