Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
₹525 (30% OFF)
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
NOTICE OF ADMISSION ALONG WITH APPLICATION FOR SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN TWO COMPANIES (Form No. NCLT 1 & 2)
Two Companies are getting merged. This is a standard precedent of Notice of Admission along with Application for Scheme of Arrangement between the Companies to be filed before the National Company Law Tribunal.
₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COMPANY PETITION FOR OPPRESSION AND MIS MANAGEMENT
The Petitioners are minority shareholders. The Respondents are managing the Company to their benefit and detrimental to the interest of the Company and the Shareholders. The conduct of the Respondents is oppressive. This is the precedent of Company Petition for oppression and mismanagement to be preferred before NCLT.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY OPERATIONAL CREDITOR UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE,2016
You are the Operational Creditor (not Financial Creditor) of the Company. Your legitimate dues are not paid by the Company inspite of the statutory notie. You need to approach National Company Law Tribunal. This is the standard precedent of an Application by Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION BY A THIRD PARTY TO INTERVENE IN PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL UNDER SECTION 9 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY, CODE 2016 FOR SAFEGUARDING ITS INTEREST AND FOR BEING IMPLEADED AS PARTY TO THE PROCEEDINGS
The Application under Section 9 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is filed before NCLT. A third party desires to intervene in the said proceedings to safeguard its interest and desires to join in the said proceedings as party Respondent. This is the precedent of Miscellaneous Application to be filed before NCLT in the said proceedings to intervene and safeguard the rights of the Applicant/Intervener.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL FROM ORDER TO BE FILED BEFORE THE SUPEIROR COURT AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LOWER CIVIL COURT IN AN APPLICATION FOR INTERIM RELIEFS
Appeal from Order is to be filed against certain orders passed in a suit before its final decision as provided under Section 104 read with Order 43, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The trial court has passed an interim order and which is required to be challenged before the higher or superior court. This is the precedent for the same.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO BE FILED BEFORE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL TO PLACE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ON BOARD FOR URGENT HEARING
The Petition and/or Miscellaneous Application is not reaching for hearing before NCLT and /or one desires to place it on board before the appropriate bench of NCLT for urgent hearing-orders. This is the precedent of an interlocutory application for the same.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.