Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
₹350 (30% OFF)
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRSTÂ APPEALÂ WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF AÂ SECOND APPEALÂ BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INVOCATION NOTICE UNDER ARBTIRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 FOR APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATOR
Disputes have arose between the Parties and the Agreement between them provides for referring the same to Arbitration. This is the precedent of Invocation Notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator/s to arbitrate dispute between the Parties as per the written contract.
₹245 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 61 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 (`IB CODE’) AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL (NCLT)
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has passed an Order. The aggrieved party desires to challenge the same before The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). This is the precedent of an Appeal challenging the said Order under the provisions of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION TO BE FILED BEFORE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL TO PLACE THE MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION ON BOARD FOR URGENT HEARING
The Petition and/or Miscellaneous Application is not reaching for hearing before NCLT and /or one desires to place it on board before the appropriate bench of NCLT for urgent hearing-orders. This is the precedent of an interlocutory application for the same.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY OPERATIONAL CREDITOR UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE,2016
You are the Operational Creditor (not Financial Creditor) of the Company. Your legitimate dues are not paid by the Company inspite of the statutory notie. You need to approach National Company Law Tribunal. This is the standard precedent of an Application by Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
COMPANY PETITION FOR OPPRESSION AND MIS MANAGEMENT
The Petitioners are minority shareholders. The Respondents are managing the Company to their benefit and detrimental to the interest of the Company and the Shareholders. The conduct of the Respondents is oppressive. This is the precedent of Company Petition for oppression and mismanagement to be preferred before NCLT.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.