Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
- You can't purchase more than 5 items in a day.
Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 (4) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH RULE 70 OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES, 2016 AGAINST THE COMPANY’S REFUSAL TO TRANSFER THE SAID SHARES
₹525 (30% OFF)
The equity shares in a Public Limited Company is standing in the name of the deceased. The Petitioner is legally entitled to the same. However, the Company has refused to transfer the said shares in favour of the Petitioner without sufficient cause. This is a standard precedent of Appeal under Section 58(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Rule 70 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 against the Company’s refusal to transfer the said shares.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT U/S. 374(3) OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION BY MAGISTRATE’S COURT
The person is convicted by the Learned Magistrate’s Court. The Appeal is to be preferred. This is the precedent of an Appeal before the Sessions Court u/s. 374(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the Judgment and Order of Conviction by Magistrate’s Court.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY WAY OF COMPANY PETITION/APPEAL FOR RESTORATION OF THE NAME OF THE COMPANY WHICH WAS STRUCK OFF BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES
The Company defaulted in filing statutory documents with the Registrar of Companies. Therefore, the Registrar of Companies have struck off the name of the Company from the list of Register of Companies. Now remedy is to approach NCLT. This is the precedent of an Application by way of Company Petition/Appeal for restoration of the name of the Company which was struck off by the Registrar of Companies.
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
GROUNDS OF APPEAL TO BE FILED BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALONGWITH FORM NO. 36 [Rule 47(1)] UNDER SECTION 253 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act has passed an Order against the Assessee. Now this needs to be challenged further. This is the precedent of Grounds of Appeal to be filed before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal along with Form No.36 [Rule 47(1)] under Section 253 The Income Tax Act against the Order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)
₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
FIRST APPEAL CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE LOWER CIVIL COURT BEFORE THE SUPERIOR COURT
This is a precedent of First Appeal to High Court. First Appeal challenging the Judgment and order passed by the Lower Civil Court before the Superior Court. An aggrieved party to any decree, which was passed by a Court while exercising its original jurisdiction, is conferred with at least one right to appeal to a higher authority designated for this purpose, unless the provisions of any statute make an exception for it.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
AN APPEAL BEFORE DRAT CHALLENGING THE INTERIM ORDER OF THE DRT
This is a precedent of an appeal before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Challenging the interim order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debt due to Bank and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
FORM OF DEMAND NOTICE / INVOICE DEMANDING PAYMENT UNDER THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016
You are the bonafide Creditor of the Company and the Company is not paying your dues. You wish to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution process against the Company. You need to serve a demand notice in the prescribed form. This is the standard form of Demand Notice/Invoice demanding payment under the insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹245 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION SEEKING CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL UNDER SECTION 58 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 READ WITH THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL RULES 2016
There is a delay in filing an Appeal before NCLT for transferring the shares in favour of the Appellant. This is the standard precedent of an Application seeking condonation of delay in filing Appeal under Section 58 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with the National Company Law Tribunal Rules 2016.
₹350 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 61 OF THE INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 (`IB CODE’) AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL (NCLT)
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has passed an Order. The aggrieved party desires to challenge the same before The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). This is the precedent of an Appeal challenging the said Order under the provisions of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPLICATION BY THE FINANCIAL CREDITOR TO INITIATE CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS UNDER SECTION 7 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE, 2016 READ WITH RULE 4 OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY (APPLICATION TO ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY) RULES, 2016.
The Financial Creditors are not paid by the Company and they need to commence Insolvency Resolution Process against the Company. This is the standard precedent of an Application by the Financial Creditor to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Rule 4 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016.
₹525 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!
THE DECREE/ JUDGMENT PASSED BY ANY APPELLATE CIVIL COURT IN THE FIRST APPEAL WHICH COURT IS SUBORDINATE TO HIGH COURT CAN BE CHALLENGED BY WAY OF A SECOND APPEAL BEFORE THE HIGH COURT IF THE CASE INVOLVES A SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW (SECTION 100 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)
"The decree/ judgment passed by any appellate Civil Court in the first appeal which court is sub-ordinate to High Court can be challenged by way of a second appeal before the High Court provided the case involves a substantial question of law. This is a precedent of Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908."
₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!
APPEAL UNDER SECTION 15-T OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992, BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (SAT) CHALLENGING THE ORDER (PENALTIES AND ADJUDICATION) OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA PASSED UNDER CHAPTER VIA OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
This is a precedent of an appeal under section 15-T of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, before the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) challenging the order (Penalties and Adjudication) of Securities and Exchange Board of India passed under Chapter via of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.