Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI FOR QUASHING IMPUGNED NOTICES/ANALYSIS REPORTS UNDER FOOD SAFETY AND STANDARDS ACT, 2006
₹700.00 (30% OFF)
This is the precedent of the Writ of Certiorari for Quashing Impugned Notices/Analysis Reports Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Food, safety and standard authority of India has issued recall notices to the Petitioner for recall of the petitioner’s products from the market.
Recommended based on your search
-
Sale!
AN APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 17 OF THE SECUTARISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002
The Bank/Financial Institution has issued a notice u/s. 13 (2) of The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and threatening to take actions under the same. This is a precedent of an application under Section 17 of the Secutarisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 to be filed before Debt Recovery Tribunal challenging the said action of the Bank/Financial Institution.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION SEEKING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY THE COLLEGE FOR GRANT OF RECOGNITION OF THE COURSE
This is a precedent of Writ of Mandamus filed before the Hon'ble High Court where a college is seeking grant of recognition of their course.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
NOTICE OF DISSOLUTION OF A PARTNERSHIP FIRM
These are the precedents of notice for dissolution of a partnership firm at will and subsequent public notice. The Partnership/Partnership Firm is at will and a partner desires to dissolve the same.
₹350.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION (WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS) TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT FOR CHALLENGING ACTION BY THE REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES (ROC) FOR DISQUALIFICATION THE PETITIONER AS DIRECTOR
The Petitioner is disqualified to act as the Director by the Registrar of Companies. The decision of the Registrar of Companies needs to be challenged. This is the precedent of Writ Petition (Writ of Certiorari and Mandamus) to be filed before the High Court for Challenging action by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for disqualification the Petitioner as Director.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
COUNTER STATEMENT TO THE NOTICE OF OPPOSITION TO THE REGISTRATION OF THE TRADE MARK
This is the precedent of Counter Statement (by the Applicant) to the Notice of Opposition filed under Trade Marks Act, 1999 opposing the registration of the Trade Mark advertised in Trade Journal.
₹420.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (FIR) UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973
This is the precedent of Criminal Writ Petition For Quashing Of First Information Report (Fir) Under Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The first information report is registered against you by the investigating agency. The person feels the same is prime facie illegal and not maintainable.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO BE FILED BEFORE THE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION) CHALLENGING THE ORDER OF QUASI JUDICIAL AUTHORITY
This is the precedent of Writ of Certiorari to be filed before the Hon’ble High Court. The Writ of Certiorari can be filed for quashing the order already passed by an inferior court, tribunal or quasi-judicial authority. This is the Writ Petition challenging the Order of deemed conveyance by quasi Judicial authority in respect of Freehold property.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF QUO WARRANTO BEFORE THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT (WRIT PETITION)
Writ of quo warranto means a writ that you can be issued to restrain a person from holding any public office in the capacity of a Public Officer to which he/she does not have the entitlement. Here, the term Quo-Warranto means, "by what authority"; or, "on whose authority is one holding a public office". This is a precedent of Writ Petition of Quo Warranto.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT PETITION UNDER SECTION 482 OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE FOR QUASHING OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (BY CONSENT OF THE PARTIES)
This is the precedent of Writ petition for quashing of First Information Report (FIR) to the High Court by consent of the parties.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
CEASE AND DESIST NOTICE FOR INFRINGEMENT OF TRADE MARK, BEING THE TITLE OF THE CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILM
This is the precedent of a Cease and desist Notice for infringement of the trademark being the title of the feature film. The producers are the registered proprietor of the trade mark being the title of the film. Someone is in infringement of the Producers’ proprietary right in the said title making a film with the same title.
₹525.00 (30% OFF) Add to Cart -
Sale!
WRIT OF PROHIBITION/CERTIORARI/MANDAMUS UNDER TRADE MARKS ACT, 1999 FOR MAINTAINING REGISTERED TRADEMARK ON THE REGISTER ON THE GROUND OF NON SERVICE/NON ISSUANCE OF NOTICE U/S. 25 (3) OF THE TRADE MARKS ACT,1999 AND RULE 64 THE TRADE MARKS RULE, 2002
This is the precedent of the Writ of Prohibition/Certiorari/Mandamus Under Trade Marks Act, 1999 for maintaining Registered Trademark On The Register On The Ground Of Non Service/Non Issuance Of Notice U/S. 25 (3) Of The Trade Marks Act,1999 and Rule 64 The Trade Marks Rule, 2002. The Petitioner’s trademark is a registered trademark on the file of the trademarks registry. However, the trademark authority is threatening to remove the Petitioner’s trademark from the records of the registry of trademarks.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart -
Sale!
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION – WRIT OF MANDAMUS ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE
The Respondent No. 2 is causing public nuisance to the public at large and particularly the residents of a locality. The Respondent No. 1, the Municipal Corporation being the government body, is not taking any steps to stop the public nuisance. This is the precedent of a Public Interest Litigation to be filed before the High Court seeking to restrain the Respondent No.2 from causing and continuing to cause such public nuisance and certain directions against the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that public nuisance is stopped.
₹700.00 (30% OFF) Preview Here Add to Cart
Reviews
There are no reviews yet.