Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
- View cart You cannot add another "SERVICE TENANCY AGREEMENT" to your cart.
CONDUCTING AGREEMENT
₹750 ₹525 (30% OFF)
The Owners are running a business from their premises and are allowing a third party to conduct the said business on the agreed terms. This is a precedent of the Conducting Agreement.
Recommended based on your search
- Sale!

AGREEMENT OF TRANSFER OF TENANCY
The existing tenant is desirous of transferring his tenancy rights in favour of an incoming tenant with the consent of the landlords. This is the precedent of an agreement of transfer of tenancy with the consent of the landlords (FOR STATE OF MAHARASHTRA).
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

LEAVE AND LICENSE AGREEMENT OF A SHOP IN THE MALL
This is a precedent of the Leave and License Agreement in respect of a Shop in the Mall.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT BY PLAINTIFFS/TENANTS UNDER THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT,1999 FOR A DECLARATION THAT THE PLAINTIFFS ARE THE TENANTS OF THE SUIT PREMISES
This is a precedent of the suit by the Tenants for order and decree declaring the Plaintiffs as the monthly tenants of the suit premises under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

EVICTION NOTICE TO TENANT FOR DAMAGING THE TENANTED PROPERTY AND CARRYING OUT PERMANENT STRUCTURAL CHANGES WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF THE LANDLORD
This is a precedent of eviction notice to the tenant for damaging the tenanted property and carrying out permanent structural changes without the consent of the Landlord under the provisions of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

REVISION PETITION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT AT DELHI AGAINST THE EVICTION ORDER OF RENT CONTROLLER UNDER DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958
The Rent Controller under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 has passed on eviction order against the Tenant. This is the precedent of revision petition before the High Court at Delhi against the eviction order of Rent Controller
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (i) THE TENANT HAS UNLAWFULLY SUB-LET OR GIVEN ON LICENSE THE PREMISES UNDER SECTION 16(1)(e) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND (ii) THE PREMISES ARE REQUIRED FOR THE IMMEDIATE PURPOSE OF DEMOLITION ORDERED BY ANY MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OR OTHER COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 16(1)(k) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999.
This is a precedent of an eviction suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court or before the court of civil judge for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises on the grounds that the Tenant has unlawfully sublet or given on license the premises as contemplated under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and further that the said premises are required by the landlord for immediate demolition as ordered by the concerned authority under section 16(1)(e) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 .
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED BY APPELLATE BENCH OF SMALL CAUSES COURT
This is a precedent of Revision Petition to the Hon’ble High Court under section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code,1908.A revision to High Court is available only in those cases and against such orders where no appeal lies and revisional jurisdiction can be exercised suo moto in certain cases including on the ground of jurisdiction error.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT THE TENANT HAS NOT USED THE PREMISES FOR A CONTINUOUS PERIOD OF MORE THAN SIX MONTHS UNDER SECTION 16(1)(n) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit to be filed before the Small Causes Court or before the court of civil judge for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises on the ground that the Tenant has not used the said premises for a continuous period of more than six months as contemplated under section 16(1)(n) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Add to Cart - Sale!

DEED OF TRANSFER BY WHICH THE LANDLORD IS TRANSFERRING THE UNIT IN FAVOUR OF THE PURCHASER AND AT THE SAME TIME THE EXISTING TENANT IS SURRENDERING HIS TENANCY RIGHTS IN FAVOUR OF THE PURCHASER
There is an existing Tenant in the premises. The Landlords/Owners are desirous of transferring the ownership of the premises in favour of the Purchasers and at the same time the Tenant is surrendering his tenancy rights so that the Purchasers get the ownership of the premises with the vacant possession from the Tenant. This is a precedent of Deed of Transfer by which the Landlord is transferring the premises in favour of the Purchasers and at the same time the existing Tenant is surrendering the tenancy rights.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR ADVERTISEMENT HOARDING
The Owner of the hoarding for advertisement is desirous of giving the same on leave and license basis to a third party. This is the precedent of leave and license agreement in respect of hoarding for the advertisement.
₹750₹525 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

EVICTION SUIT BEFORE THE SMALL CAUSES COURT OR THE COURT OF CIVIL JUDGE FOR RECOVERY OF POSSESSION ON THE GROUND THAT – (A) THE TENANT HAS BEEN GUILTY OF CONDUCT WHICH IS A NUISANCE OR ANNOYANCE TO THE ADJOINING OR NEIGHBOURING OCCUPIER UNDER SECTION 16(1)(c) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT, 1999; AND {B} THE PREMISES ARE REASONABLY AND BONA FIDE REQUIRED BY THE LANDLORD UNDER SECTION 16(1)(g) OF THE MAHARASHTRA RENT CONTROL ACT 1999
This is a precedent of an eviction suit before the Small Causes Court or the Court of Civil judge for recovery of possession on the ground that – (a) The Tenant has been guilty of conduct which is a nuisance of annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier under Section 16(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and (b) The premises are reasonably and bonafide required by the Landlord for occupation by himself under Section 16(1)(g) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.
₹1000₹700 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart - Sale!

PETITION UNDER SECTION 14(1) READ WITH SECTION 25B OF THE DELHI RENT CONTROL ACT, 1958 (AS AMENDED UPTO DATE) FOR EVICTION OF THE RESPONDENT/ TENANT FROM THE TENANTED PREMISES ON THE GROUND OF NON-PAYMENT OF RENT IN SPITE OF REQUIRED NOTICE
The Tenancy is governed under The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. The Tenant has not paid the rent inspite of requisite notice. This is the precedent for eviction of Tenant from the Tenanted Premises on the ground of Non-payment of rent inspite of Notice.
₹500₹350 (30% OFF) Preview HereAdd to Cart













Reviews
There are no reviews yet.